Piers got this one spot on. In a really good game, i LOVE to limp with this hand, knowing full well that all the mizors with A6, QT are gonna be right in there with me. Its clearly a raies or fold hand otherwise, in full ring i raise in late MP/LP, and pretty much fold anywhere else unless its a damn good game. I do like to gamble, but easily dominated hands are not the ones to gamble with.

LPP, TPP, raise. Your hands prolly better than the LPPs hand, and the TPP, even if hes got a better hand which he might, your position can win the pot off him.

TAA, fold. I hate getting into a pot against a TAA with ATo when he gets in there from EP, position or not. THeres a pretty good chance he has a better hand. Hes not limping KT or A9 probly, and if he is hes prolly not really that TAA.

LAA ill limp, since my hands probly better than his. Dont really want to raise and mae myself a target against an LAA mizor and have to deal with trying to but the pot when the flop comes down 784. Id you can be almost certain your raise will isolate him then a raise might be better, oftentimes if theres an LAA limper and then a raise, mizors in LP/blinds will often call since the pot looks like it might be gettin decent sized, and the LAA is in there and everyone (oftentimes stupidly) wants to get into a pot against the LAA. Against a true LAA, the type that threebets the turn with gutshots and less, i play my hand strictly for value (as most do i think), so i dont mind gettin in there cheap, controlling the pot size early on, and muckin if i miss.

Maniac-probably same as LAA, but a little more inclined to fold against a mizor whose a bonafide maniac..