PokerStars Game #12156119989: Hold'em No Limit ($5/$10) - 2007/09/19 - 21:11:37 (ET)
Table 'Askania' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Xaston ($1057 in chips)
Seat 2: Alotofaction ($1144.20 in chips)
Seat 4: Roland62 ($1000 in chips)
Seat 5: Sleepy80 ($987 in chips)
Seat 6: Blazed187 ($988 in chips)
Alotofaction: posts small blind $5
LOSTinLONDON joins the table at seat #3
Roland62: posts big blind $10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Xaston [Jc Jd]
Sleepy80: folds
Blazed187: raises $30 to $40
Xaston: raises $90 to $130
Alotofaction: folds
Roland62: calls $120
Blazed187: raises $858 to $988 and is all-in
Xaston: folds
Blazed limps and min-raises more than any other multi-tabling I've ever seen. I am pretty sure that they both symbolize weakness, therefore 4x has to be at least moderate strength. Thoughts?
PokerStars Game #12157780611: Hold'em No Limit ($5/$10) - 2007/09/19 - 22:42:52 (ET)
Table 'Stephano III' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Alotofaction ($1614 in chips)
Seat 2: Xaston ($1562.80 in chips)
Seat 3: plghh ($758.50 in chips)
Seat 4: Daut44 ($1128.50 in chips)
Seat 5: CarlyBear ($427 in chips)
Seat 6: MezmerizePLZ ($1005 in chips)
Xaston: posts small blind $5
plghh: posts big blind $10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Xaston [Qs Qd]
Daut44: folds
CarlyBear: folds
MezmerizePLZ: raises $20 to $30
Alotofaction: folds
Xaston: raises $90 to $120
plghh: raises $130 to $250
MezmerizePLZ: raises $755 to $1005 and is all-in
Xaston: folds
MezmerizePLZ is about as good as they come. plghh prolly sucks due to stack size.