Table was pretty passive overall. I'm not a big fan of two pair, especially bad two pair. I've been trying to play straightforward whether I have it or not so they will fold when I try to buy it, or if they try to play back, I often have it and can pop them back.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.5 BB (9 handed)

CO ($52.4)
Button ($15.75)
SB ($22.4)
Hero ($46)
UTG ($16.05)
UTG+1 ($46.33)
MP1 ($33.9)
MP2 ($82.32)
MP3 ($25)

Preflop: Hero is BB with , .
UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 calls $0.50, CO folds, Button calls $0.50, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: ($2) , , (4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $2, MP3 folds, Button folds, SB folds.

Final Pot: $4

Results in white below:
No showdown. Hero wins $4.

Who goes for a check raise on the flop or is this a pretty straight forward hand and this is just how its done.

Still trying to work my way into being completely comfortable with NLHE online. Still used to the home games against the same bad opponents.

I think it is a fine hand to play straightforward. If someone had caught a piece of the board (like a queen) they would have stayed with you because that flop is really ragedy. I might slowplay it for 1 street because of the low amount of possible hands that can even improve to beat you off of one card, but leading out is fine too. Maybe you could have made a smaller bet, like only half the pot.

Leading out here is a great, deceptive play. I use it often...with trips too. A lot of times you won't get action...but when you do, you can usually pop them back on the flop or turn. On Party, it's an easy to get their stack/..espeically if they hold something like QJ in this spot.