Interesting idea RE: cheap coaching for all players
Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department
Interesting idea RE: cheap coaching for all players
by GodlikeRoy » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:08 am
Last edited by GodlikeRoy on Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:45 pm, edited 21 times in total.
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
-
GodlikeRoy - Posts: 7430
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am
by black_knight6 » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:10 am
-
black_knight6 - Semi Pro (Online)
- Posts: 10012
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: Victoria BC
by black_knight6 » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:12 am
Presumably, the 200 person gets the 400+ for free right?
-
black_knight6 - Semi Pro (Online)
- Posts: 10012
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: Victoria BC
by shamdonk » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:15 am
Wait do the coaches have to be from BTP?
Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
-
shamdonk - Posts: 4279
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
- Location: amherst, MA
by GodlikeRoy » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:15 am
The NL200 player pays $65/hr for the coaching. Like I said though the numbers are flexible if someone comes up with a fairer system through maths or whatever. I basically just made those up to what sounded reasonable in my head.
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
-
GodlikeRoy - Posts: 7430
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am
by black_knight6 » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:16 am
It sounds like the players put $$ into a pot, and the top player collects the pot...
-
black_knight6 - Semi Pro (Online)
- Posts: 10012
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
- Location: Victoria BC
by GodlikeRoy » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:16 am
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
-
GodlikeRoy - Posts: 7430
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am
by shamdonk » Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:24 am
Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
-
shamdonk - Posts: 4279
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
- Location: amherst, MA
-
DoctorHandles - Posts: 2401
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm
by hard2tel » Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:25 am
I think it would be easier to have a 'main coach' at every 3 levels or so. Rather than 1 400nl coach being responsible for 5 players who each need a different level of coaching. i.e the 10nl player would probably be confused alot and require more assistance ..and the 200nl player would probably get pissed at the main coach having to waste time explaining stupid trivial stuff to the 10nl player.
Maybe a 100nl coach being responsible for 50nl and less. and the 400nl coach being responsible for 100nl and 200nl. And then maybe a 5000nl coach being responsible for 400nl thru 2000nl.
I dunno i just think having a 400nl player coach 10nl thru 200nl wouldnt be very sufficient.
edit- ok well i realize now that u mean each player coaches the player below him...not in one big group.
i like the idea. let me think about it.
Maybe a 100nl coach being responsible for 50nl and less. and the 400nl coach being responsible for 100nl and 200nl. And then maybe a 5000nl coach being responsible for 400nl thru 2000nl.
I dunno i just think having a 400nl player coach 10nl thru 200nl wouldnt be very sufficient.
edit- ok well i realize now that u mean each player coaches the player below him...not in one big group.
i like the idea. let me think about it.
"But meh, what I lack for in talent and intelligence I make up for in lack of ambition." -- Oatmealforxmas
- make more than xaston and roy
- make more than xaston and roy
-
hard2tel - Posts: 4483
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Atlanta
Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest