by Stoneburg » Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:37 pm
Actually, as I recall it, thy say that th transition from pot-limit to no-limit is easier (which is obvious). Anyway, I think pot-limit requires more skill, and position is even more important than in no-limit. Both those things argues that it's better to try no-limit first. On th other hand, you're a bit more "protected" in pot-limit due to th limitations in bet sizes. Still, I'd recommend trying NL first since it's easier.
I actually make about twice as much in BB/100 in pot-limit compared to no-limit. I think this is mainly because:
- I value position, most opponents don't.
- Bad players can't just go all-in on the flop, they HAVE to play turn and river, more decisions from them equals more opportunities for them to make mistakes and for me not to. A classic example is the newbie that always goes all-in with the flush draw on the lop, in Pot-Limit I wll charge him all the way thnNOT pay him off, so I make a lot more.
- People feel safer and play looser