Advanced search

re-raising question

Hand analysis. Post your trouble hands here

Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department

re-raising question

Postby Aisthesis » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:24 pm

User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby GodlikeRoy » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:30 pm

Poker is silly.

It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.

Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.

User avatar
GodlikeRoy
 
Posts: 7430
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am

Re: re-raising question

Postby johnnie_naked » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:43 pm

Last edited by johnnie_naked on Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
johnnie_naked
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:57 pm

Postby Semillon » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:43 pm

User avatar
Semillon
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:13 pm

Postby Aisthesis » Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:06 pm

User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby black_knight6 » Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:37 pm

User avatar
black_knight6
Semi Pro (Online)
 
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
Location: Victoria BC

Postby Aisthesis » Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:25 pm

Yeah, without really having tried it, I feel a lot more comfortable doing it with position.

After a re-raise, even something like AK on a hit is probably just as well off betting out as anything else, and if they play that way, it lets you off the hook cheap--assuming you missed.
User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby rickjr82 » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:39 pm

I think I do it more OOP, because in 6-max there is simply more opportuinities.

Late position raises are generally weaker and so your 3-betting range should go down as well when you are protecting the blinds.

If you are 3 betting in position with most pairs, you are losing any possibility to play for set value and generally have to give up vs an EP 4-bet. If you flat call in position it is much easier to use other tools such as floating, semibluffing(for free cards), etc.

3-betting takes out a lot of any advantage you have(or don't have) in post flop play.
I got my hair highlighted, because I felt some strands were more important that others.
-Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
rickjr82
 
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: lexington

Postby Triple B » Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:48 am

With pairs that are not "traditional" 3-betting hands like 22-88 I prefer to call in position and 3-bet or call OOP. The same can be said about SCs and other good but not premium hands that play well multiway.

Why?

In position I can (almost) assure myself to see a flop for relatively cheap and hope for a set. If I hit a set I can often get paid as my call of the PFR often causes one or more of the blinds to come along. If I don't hit a set I can still outplay my opponents some of the time, especially when heads up.

OOP it is very difficult to outplay your opponent, plus it is difficult to get paid when you hit. Therefore, since the value of seeing a flop is lower, 3-betting becomes a better option (heads up). If the pot is multiway, then calling is better since our implied odds are higher.
Villain: Why?
Villain: How?
Me: I had a feeling
Villian: Sit in you cretin
User avatar
Triple B
 
Posts: 3242
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:36 am

Postby Aisthesis » Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:41 am

Good points there, too--leaving in my mind pros and cons to both.

6max I'm not so sure about the multi-way aspect. It seems anyway as if the vast majority of pots are 3-way or HU. I think if you can get it 4-way or better then just calling with the middle pairs is better really with or without position, since you're getting quite good pot odds already.

I think from LP, doing it with that range might be for one thing a recipe to slow down someone whom you feel is raising too much in EP. You definitely don't want to do it against someone in EP who's overly tight because you do have good chances of their having a big hand and you don't want to get blown off yours.

They're probably also pretty decent re-raises as blind defense OOP.

Objectively, if you're re-raising moderately on 77+ and AQ+, does KJ have to lay down to the re-raise? I kind of think so.

Anyhow, what I've kind of been experimenting with today (and am rather liking) is making various re-raises, often with junk but sometimes with big hands, in principle from all positions--enough where they know I can't be doing it even with a JJ+ and AK range but trying to keep them guessing about the whole thing.

Doing this, I do end up getting a reasonable number of callers.

Also, I think I tend to like a larger re-raise OOP (with like 4-5x bet) the intention of taking the pot down immediately but a smaller re-raise (more like 3xbet) with position.
User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby Aisthesis » Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:42 am

Good points there, too--leaving in my mind pros and cons to both.

6max I'm not so sure about the multi-way aspect. It seems anyway as if the vast majority of pots are 3-way or HU. I think if you can get it 4-way or better then just calling with the middle pairs is better really with or without position, since you're getting quite good pot odds already.

I think from LP, doing it with that range might be for one thing a recipe to slow down someone whom you feel is raising too much in EP. You definitely don't want to do it against someone in EP who's overly tight because you do have good chances of their having a big hand and you don't want to get blown off yours.

They're probably also pretty decent re-raises as blind defense OOP.

Objectively, if you're re-raising moderately on 77+ and AQ+, does KJ have to lay down to the re-raise? I kind of think so.

Anyhow, what I've kind of been experimenting with today (and am rather liking) is making various re-raises, often with junk but sometimes with big hands, in principle from all positions--enough where they know I can't be doing it even with a JJ+ and AK range but trying to keep them guessing about the whole thing.

Doing this, I do end up getting a reasonable number of callers.

Also, I think I tend to like a larger re-raise OOP (with like 4-5x bet) the intention of taking the pot down immediately but a smaller re-raise (more like 3xbet) with position.
User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby GodlikeRoy » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:52 am

Poker is silly.

It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.

Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.

User avatar
GodlikeRoy
 
Posts: 7430
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am

Postby GodlikeRoy » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:01 am

Poker is silly.

It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.

Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.

User avatar
GodlikeRoy
 
Posts: 7430
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am

Postby Aisthesis » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:24 pm

User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby Aisthesis » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:39 pm

User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Next

Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron