I agree with the genius. If his thought process was actually the way he describes it in the article I have absolutely no problem with the way he played his hand. I guess you've got to put into perspective that this isn't some party poker NL25 table where you HAVE to raise to define your hand, given the tendencies of your opponents etc. you can make a lot more read based decisions and this one seemed fine.

Getting someone to bluff a worse hand is implied in what Keller is saying. Keller is right, whenever no worse hand than you can call, and every better hand than you will call, assuming the pot isn't significant, it makes almost no sense to ever bet.