I play mainly $25 NL on PP or $0.25/$0.50 NL on PS. I play TA / TAP and so I don't often play junk hands and try not to play marginal/ speculative cards out of position. Kind of basic stuff, but it's working. After 7k ring hands, I am up by about 100% (not counting bonuses). I would consider my self a strong beginner.
This may seem obvious to some folks, but there are a lot of instances where I am not sure if I should bet or just limp. I have two instances recently that got me thinking seriously about when to bet and how much.
I had some folks at an another site review a number of HHs. First issue was the min bet. I found I was raising the blind amount on weaker hands or from EP. Looking back, it seems I should have limped or bet 3-4XBB with most hands. Other times, I was asked "Why did you bet there?" or "Why didn't you bet more?". I often did not have an answer. Did I want to bet for value, did I want to bet to isolate, did I want to bet to give opponenets the wrong pot-odds to draw?
With that in mind, I thought I should examine how to bet starting hands more closely.(more later on flop/trun/river bets)
Here is my question. Assuming T/A play against loose/passive tables with a mix of playing types, what starting hands should be bet/limped/ called for x bets or raised and re-raised.
I know that there is a lot of "depends" in this question. So feel free to add the caveats or used general types of hands. Most importantly, please explain why one should bet/limp/raise a particular starting hand.
If there is a giude here or elsewhere that discusses this subject, please point me to it instead.[/b]