by Aisthesis » Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:41 pm
I'm with Kenny on the all-in, but a note on your re-raise:
Against an unknown opponent, I really prefer re-raising more simply because I don't know whether I can believe them on a set or not. My intention, if they call is to go all the way with AA unless the flop is absolutely horrible, but I don't want to put them in a favorable odds situation to set on me.
But if the PF re-raise is to $2.50, he's only calling $1.65 for a shot at your stack of $24. That does give him odds for the set if he has something like 99 (and a lot of people do like raising 55 as well).
This larger raise does somewhat devalue your AA against perceptive opponents (we don't know here whether this guy is or not), because they can just lay down.
If I know my player a little better, I can re-raise smaller--hoping that AK might give me some dead money and at least having some idea how far this opponent will go with JJ under various circumstances. If I do re-raise smaller, I like to be a bit careful if a J or Q flops--not to say I'm not betting it, but I try to figure out a hand strategy so that I don't get stacked if they set.
I will say that AA really made my week this past week--getting frivolous callers to big raises PF. I needed it because I got into a lot of bad set situations...