Advanced search

Tight and aggressive at higher buy-ins?

Hand analysis. Post your trouble hands here

Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department

Tight and aggressive at higher buy-ins?

Postby snok » Wed May 25, 2005 5:50 am

Dear folks,
I've had some success lately playing start hands such as 22/AQ/A9s, depending on position and limp-in with suited connectors in Late position.
This seems to work OK at NL Party (50USD). I end up at ca VI%PF 23%, and 1.9BB/100.

How should this be modified to do OK at 1/2 or 2/4 NL tables?

Thanks in advance,

snok 8-) [/i]
User avatar
snok
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 5:44 am

Postby excession » Wed May 25, 2005 5:55 am

perhaps you shouldn't jump from $50 to $200 & $400 tables...

the marginal hands get trickier to play the better the opposition gets but hands like 22 are pretty easy to play set or fold with at any level I would think..
User avatar
excession
Enthusiast (Online)
 
Posts: 3872
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:52 pm
Location: manchester uk

Postby rdale » Wed May 25, 2005 1:11 pm

User avatar
rdale
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:10 pm

Postby iceman5 » Wed May 25, 2005 2:07 pm

iceman5 [As]
User avatar
iceman5
Semi Pro (Online)
 
Posts: 13875
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Texas

Postby APerfect10 » Wed May 25, 2005 4:52 pm

Your win rate is 1.9BB/100 while playing NL? if so, you have many leaks that we need to talk about.

Agreed. You should probably think about moving down to $25 NL and working on your game. My rule of thumb is that you should move up if you can sustain 8 PTBB/100 over 15,000+ hands. You should move down if you can not sustain at least 3, preferably 4 PTBB/100 over a large sample.
User avatar
APerfect10
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: Pennsylvania


Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron