Advanced search

OKayyyyyy... 400NL and not too far out of my depth (maybe)..

Hand analysis. Post your trouble hands here

Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department

Postby Rhound50 » Tue May 31, 2005 6:07 pm

Stelvask, the problem here is that the min raise is giving him odds to make the call to play for a set and thats exactly what he hit, this flop is really not that different than if the flop came 223 rainbow you are still behind the same one hand that you were behind preflop, the only difference is in the 223 example your opponant has 3 outs to beat you not 2. I would still be inclinded to fold. I have made some really solid reads lately, now if only I would trust myself to go with them, and not wimp out. There is nothing more frusterating to lose a big hand when you know you should have folded or fold a hand you think is the winner when and find out that your read was on the money but you didnt follow it.
"Its a pink handbag not backpack damn it." Godlikeroy

"From playing full tilt I wanna smash every garden gnome I see. That travelocity commercial puts me on instant tilt."
User avatar
Rhound50
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 7304
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:15 am
Location: La Jolla, Ca

Postby palman » Tue May 31, 2005 6:24 pm

Although the thought process of "the min raise gives him the odds to play for a set" is completely disregarding reverse implied odds.
User avatar
palman
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:27 pm

Previous

Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron