Bosox - I'm afraid you misunderstand the word 'theory' when used in a scientific context.
Creationists often intentionally misuse the word when they claim 'evolution is only a theory' to laymen and you seem to have fallen into their trap.


Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The word theory has a number of distinct meanings in different fields of knowledge, depending on their methodologies and the context of discussion.

In science, a theory is a mathematical or logical explanation, or a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition. For example, it is a fact that an apple dropped on earth has been observed to fall towards the center of the planet, and the theories commonly used to describe and explain this behaviour are Newton's theory of universal gravitation (see also gravitation), and general relativity.

In common usage, the word theory is often used to signify a conjecture, an opinion, or a speculation. In this usage, a theory is not necessarily based on facts; in other words, it is not required to be consistent with true descriptions of reality. This usage of theory leads to the common statement "It's not a fact, it's only a theory." True descriptions of reality are more reflectively understood as statements which would be true independently of what people think about them. In this usage, the word is synonymous with hypothesis.

Thanks for the explaination. I'm the first to admit that I don't know as much about science as a lot of people. However, I have read a bit and I try to learn a thing or two about things that interest me. From what I've learned, I'm not convinced that the theory of evolution is 100% correct. I believe that it is true; so much so that I often find myself thinking things like "I wonder why humans evolved to have X feature because I can't see what advantage this has". But I've not seen such overwhelming evidence as to make all other ideas on the subject clearly wrong. Perhaps this is just a gap in my own knowledge and if I were to investigate further I would feel differently.

Just to re-state my overall point here so we don't miss the forest for the trees: A lot of what we know about the world and the past is incomplete. Because of this I don't think it's right to reject differing opinions outright just because they go against conventional thinking. Evolution is just one example.