Advanced search

Optimal bluffing on flop vs preflop opener

Hand analysis. Post your trouble hands here

Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department

Optimal bluffing on flop vs preflop opener

Postby rush » Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:20 am

Dear all,
I wonder if there is a place for using “optimal bluffing ratios” at lower limits of NL?
Assuming you only know the first round raiser will always bet any flop if first to act, and that the other caller (if any) is a decent player.

Example – you call or overcall a raiser with a small PP, if you call it’s in POS (say 55 in MP – hoping to get more callers in), if you overcall it may be OOP (limp + overcall with 88 in EP).

Pot-size after first round is P1.

Case 1:
I’m player B calling in POS with PP after opener A.
A bets the pot on every flop (pot=2P1) (so no info there).

I can now choose between reraising pot (to total pot= 4P1) with
a) trips or
b) trips + 50% bluffs (1:2 ratio = pot odds for A)


Is this kind of thinking with 1:2 bluff ratios overkill when playing lower limits? Is it applicable at higher limits?

Also, as it happens – a 50% bluff ratio could involve any OE-draw (less bottom-end) that you flop (88 vs 679 flop) which is just about 6% (vs 12% made sets).

Would those OE’s be perfect candidates for “bluffs”? Or would any flop containing an Ace with some extra criteria (such as Ace+one suited flop) be better? (Scary for A if holding JJ-KK, and not risking thaht A holds AKs with 4-flush)

? Thoughts appreciated!

Case 2:

I’m first to act in three way pot. I’m player A; preflop raiser is B and first caller is C.
Either I can choose to check-raise any made trips or better (knowing that Raisor will bet flop), or I can bet into raiser.
One advantage of CR is that I’ll also get info on player C.
One advantage of betting out is that I can bluff the raisor out of more pots using player C as a boogieman.

Any thoughts on this one along the lines of Case 1?

Happy and eating icecream

rush
User avatar
rush
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:11 am

Postby iceman5 » Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:33 am

Who's on first? :lol:

I think you put too many "what ifs" in there which is why you havent gotten any responses. When you get that many "what ifs", the answer is usually "it depends".

I'll say this. When you call a raise with a mid pair and theres a caller behind you, if the raiser bets pot, I would almost never raise as a bluff with a guy still yet to act behind me.

Youre going to spew chips doing that.
iceman5 [As]
User avatar
iceman5
Semi Pro (Online)
 
Posts: 13875
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Texas

Postby Kalle » Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:42 am

It is very expensive to try to bluff preflop raisers. Some players refuse to lay down TPTK or 99 on a Qxx flop.

There was a good post about bluffing some months ago. There are alot of good advice in it:

http://livepokerforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2369
User avatar
Kalle
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 10:55 am
Location: Copenhagen


Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron