Not to be a nazi, but I find hands that are either typed out and told as a story or ran thru this converter http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisoncon ... verter.cgi to be far more readable. It makes it much easier to read the action, observe how condensed the action is, you can even find room to comment between streets:

Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $.25 BB (8 handed)

CO ($23.15)
Button ($14.15)
SB ($11.40)
BB ($26.80)
UTG ($5.90)
Hero ($37.30)
MP1 ($13.90)
MP2 ($20.80)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with , .
1 fold, Hero calls $0.25, 4 folds, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: ($0.75) , , (3 players)
SB bets $0.75, BB folds, Hero calls $0.75.

Turn: ($2.25) (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

River: ($2.25) (2 players)
SB bets $1.5, Hero raises to $3, SB calls $1.50.

Final Pot: $8.25

On the last one, I don't think you're going to take his stack there sinces he's playing such a small flush, looks like he's afraid that you might have a higher flush.

I'm not so sure you could NOT have taken his stack. Would a smart player fold a small flush, especially on a paired board... Yes. However, I see time and time again people unable to fold a flush. They say, "Finally, a flush with my suited connectors. Flushes are great." This is particularly true at .25bb level and even more so when someone flops their flush (they've been thinking how great they are since the flop... tough to go from value better to must fold on the river) .

IMHO

TR

Sorry, I didn't mean to say that he "couldn't" stack him, just that it wouldn't be likely, even at the .25 level (which is the level I play, so no offense intended). I know a lot of people play a 5 high flush like it's the nuts at this level, but this particular guy, looks like he is playing the river a lot more cautiously than most at this level.