by JJSCOTT2 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:10 am
I've seen an interesting trend lately, at least at NL50 where I play so this may not apply to you. I've been following the whole min-raise = monster deal, and for the most part I agree with it, and almost certainly the check/min-raise probabally equals something that beats whatever crap you got unless you got top set on a non-straight/non-flush board. However, I've found that when I lead with a bet on the flop and get min-raised, this often means nothing more than someone who thinks they have a good hand or is unsure, usually a re-raise in this spot shuts it down, or at least when I have a hand I'm willing to lead with and get min-raised on the flop I'm going to win at showdown. I know technically this in no way relates to the original post here, but I thought it was interesting to point out.