But, something I've been seeing a lot really bothers me. Players think because they win a hand, they are good players, and because they put a bad beat on you, you're not a good player. The one thing that is the absolute overall in poker is the player who makes the least mistakes while forcing his opponent into making a mistake wins, regardless of the results.
I was in the BB with AT. Three limpers and I just called. I could have raised, but I think this would have been a mistake as I wouldn't have made all three and the SB fold. Flop comes 24J. All check. (Good.) 6 on the turn, all check. (Again, good, as it's unlikely anyone has hit so far. River is another blank. SB and I check, EP bets the pot for $240, folded to me. I type: "I can't see anything there that might have hit your hand, so I call." He showed K3o and I raked the pot. "Thanks for the chips," I typed.

Yes, I made a mistake, but I'd seen this guy play stupid and if I could put him on tilt, it might pay some dividends down the road, at least that is what was in my mind. What I didn't expect was the whole table to come gunning for me.
A little later, I was on the button with A2. Four limpers to me and I called. Huge pot odds for a marginal hand that might hit a miracle flop. It did. A24. SB bets 100 into a 200 pot, one call, I raise the pot. SB reraises and I call. Turn is a 3 and he pushes. I call. I hit my miracle and he hit his even bigger miracle. He turns over A3. Table goes wild. (Next hand I have TT in the CO, push and get two callers, which I know means my tens probably won't hold up. They don't, of course.)
It's all about mistakes. SB made a huge mistake by reraising with A3, out of position, with no odds to call. I did exactly what I should have done. According to the Theory of Poker, I won, even if I lost that hand, which is ok by me. His mistake, however, was compounded because he's not going to learn anything from actually playing the game. He thought he was so cool, beating me. But, judging from his play and his reactions, he will always be a loser.
The point I'm struggling to make is these low limit buy ins are really like OJT. You can earn while you learn. I made a mistake by antagonizing the table. I screwed up. I let my ego get out front of my good sense. I also violated my own rule about playing A2. So, I did learn something. My opponents however cannot say the same thing. I see this so often that there is no doubt in my mind when it's said that only 10% of all poker players actually make money, it's true. Very few actually will ever improve. They don't recognize when they make mistakes. They'll never move up in stakes, because they aren't going to improve enough to beat good players, and if you don't recognize a good player, you're sure to lose to them, over the long term. I'm not so sure I'm a good player, but I know I'm better than most of these assclowns who are pushing with middle pair.
This is why I'm loving these FT tourneys. They can get lucky and win their way onto the $24, and many win their way to the $75, and that's when a good player can clean up. Since I've been playing these, I think my game has improved by leaps and bounds. I've won quite a few bucks, but what I've learned is priceless. I'm improving my game and have a stack of tourney chips besides. I'm very happy with my game, if not my luck, but that's why these fish play, I suppose. For them, it's all about being lucky.
Can someone clue me in as to what's going on in the minds of these fish? Now, that's something I haven't learned.

CJ